BTC$62 609.51

-1.52%

ETH$3 172.18

-3.59%

USDT$0.999610

0.01%

BNB$589.18

-2.08%

SOL$135.65

-4.30%

USDC$0.999848

-0.01%

ICO Reviews - Page 12

The project is not original, as mentioned, and there are many others that offer the same type of service out there. Furthermore, this project raises a number of red flags, such as the fact that it doesn't require identity verification, nor does it have any restricted areas, which is quite rare to see. There is also a general lack of details, no advisors, and a lack of a white paper.

There is no denying the fact that Ulticoin is trying to tap into an immensely promising industry of gaming, which has proven to be very pro-crypto. The project has a unique selling proposition of granting gamers a possibility of trading their virtual items for ULTI or for items from other games. This cross-platform solution might be the defining feature that would set Ulticoin apart from a serious competition that emerges in this industry.

I like the idea presented by ULTI, but I am a bit concerned about the liquidity issue. How are they going to ensure it if the overwhelming number of players would want to exchange their virtual items for fiat at the same time? Such questions arise due to the fact that ULTI didn’t do a very good job of explaining their token economics. If they have a well-elaborated plan for handling such a situation, I would like to see it.

I can see that plenty of people are skeptical about Texochat because of its supposed competition with the tech giants. But they all should remember a tale about David and Goliath, where a small and seemingly weak man defeated a giant. The same could happen to Texochat, just look at the success of Slack. Sure, Texochat won't have a global reach of big corporations, but it can easily form a sizable pool of loyal users. Therefore, Texochat should be afforded a chance to enter the market.

However powerful the marketing campaign or vividly described the project's perks, I won't be getting anywhere near some crypto financial products, except for the cryptocurrencies themselves. I might miss out on some opportunities, but I tend to stick to my motto of "better safe than sorry." The governments are getting much tougher on cryptocurrencies and the associated products, especially the ones of the US and China. I can't risk having my money in crypto bonds, offered by TwoGap since it opens up too much space for the regulators to maneuver.

Before even considering an investment in ICO, I always visit the section of the startup's official website that includes information about fund allocation. The overwhelming majority of nascent crypto projects aren't concealing their intention to allocate sometimes more than half of raised funds for marketing needs, which is a strong indicator for me that they are more focused on hype than product development. The situation with HEROIC is different: these guys promise to allocate 64% of the money for development and operations, which is the right thing to do.

The project has received exceptionally high ratings, and the fact that it is supported by an official Launchpad reduces the risks, which likely means that it will do quite well during its token sale. After all, 2019 has been the year of IEOs, and while not all of them succeeded as projects - they all had very successful token sales.

Credible, and other similar projects, will be of great service to people who live in developing countries with weak banking systems, which are oftentimes as archaic and clunky as it gets, being unable to gather enough data to come up with an objective credit score for a customer. Credible addresses all these issues by developing a blockchain-enabled credit score system that is transparent, efficient, and fail-proof. Definitely one of the best projects around at the moment.

Out of all blockchain projects that offer the gold-backed digital tokens, Troy appears to be the most reliable one. First of all, the project provides definite proof of the origin of the precious metal, which is a huge deal for any responsible investors. You wouldn't want that gold to be seized by the authorities because it was involved in some shady schemes. Besides, gold appears to be the only asset worthy of keeping, apart from Bitcoin, of course, so Troy represents a natural symbiosis of the two.

I hate to say it, but I really doubt that Levblockchain will be able to reach even a softcap. Not that their initiative is bad or something. It's just that it could kindle the interest of local investors, but not more. As far as I know, Greek investors aren't particularly keen about investing in domestic projects, even such promising and helpful ones like Levblockchain. It's most likely that it would get some insignificant sums from fellow computer developers, but that would hardly be enough to make their ends meet.

I find everything about Heroic to be very appealing: the declared goals are comprehensible and feasible, the product suite holds a lot of promise, and the team appears to be knowledgeable and motivated. The "cybersecurity solution for people" would be a wonderful marketing message that should attract users en masse. Although I wonder how they plan to ensure the profitability of their endeavor since the team assures that the top-notch cybersecurity solution would be distributed at a very affordable price. In that case, I would like to know how they calculate the profit margin.

All in all, the project seems to be not only legitimate, but also very professionally organized. It remains to be seen whether or not it will succeed, but it is certainly worth keeping an eye on.

After several years of experience of investing in different ICO's and blockchain project, I can say with full confidence that I would never again invest in a crypto project that intends to use a major portion of raised funds on marketing. That is, of course, on the condition that the project doesn't have a killer MVP or a ready-to-sell product. Otherwise, it would be flushing money down the drain. This rule also applies to WINBIX - their overall concept is interesting but without a working MVP, they won't get a dime from me.

With the crypto market constantly evolving, many feel like the next-gen exchanges should start emerging, and ROKKEX could be one of the big ones in the future. However, it is also undeniable that there will be a lot of competition along the way, and that this exchange will need luck, skill, and a lot of work to rise through the ranks.

I had organized a project conceptually similar to Levblockchain back when I was living in the Czech Republic. It didn't turn out to be a huge success, but we still managed to find out some blockchain programming diamonds in the rough - now they are working with me on other projects. What I am trying to say is that projects like Levblockchain might be good for the recruitments of promising coders and other kinds of specialists, but it is not much of an investment opportunity.

The yachting enthusiasts should be excited about Yachtco as it could structurize in a proper way the defragmented sector and provide the much-needed convenience of yacht freighting and other accompanying services. But if you are not into yachts or sailing, then this project is definitely not for you, especially if you are a trader looking to profit from selling crypto. The Yachtco token will hardly ever "go to the Moon" or even make it to the Top 100.

I’m glad that I have discovered Vertex. It allows me to exchange cryptos in a hassle-free way. On the platform, I can meet real persons who want to either sell or buy digital coins and negotiate a beneficial trade with them.

The tech solution offered by BrandProtect is probably the one that would be most welcome in the business community worldwide. The reason is that the anti-counterfeit mechanism on the basis of blockchain is useful and practical, and it won't entail any legal issues with the authorities because in that case, blockchain is used more like a verification service than a payment vehicle.

People who frown at Ozotop and its idea of robotic decentralized societies should remember that some 30 years ago, we all thought that mobile phone is the work of divine power, not to mention that we would have Internet everywhere. Indeed, Ozotop might not get large traction right off the bat, but I am sure that the idea will catch on. Maybe it won't be Ozotop that will bring it to fruition, but the cyber societies are here to stay.

Let's be frank, the majority of startups that emerge in the crypto space today are just dabbling with this technology without offering something truly substantial. Soraix is a prime example of such a project as they go at length about the features of their exchange platform, but in reality, these guys have nothing to show for. $160 raised with only two weeks of ICO time left shows how even a Switzerland-based project could fail miserably.

* Crypto Rating accepts no liability for content of the comments or reviews made by the site users. The entire responsibility for the contents rests with the authors.

ICO Rating – Top Ongoing ICOs 2024

Submit ICO

#	ICO	Founded	Rate	Status	KYC	Category	Start	End
1	CNX Network	2022	4.943	Active		IoT	July 1, 2022	December 31, 2022
2	Wrapped Minima	2018	4.941	Active		Blockchain Infrastructure	February 14, 2023	February 28, 2023
3	EMCODEX	2021	4.94	Pre-sale		Commodities, Synthetic Assets	May 18, 2021	September 30, 2021
4	LetStudy	2020	4.935	Upcoming		Education	August 1, 2021	August 1, 2022
5	FUNA	2022	4.931	Active		AI	June 15, 2022	August 31, 2022
6	My Lotto Coin	2020	4.93	Pre-sale		Gaming, Lottery	April 1, 2021	June 30, 2021
7	Blockster (BXR)	2021	4.93	Upcoming		Media	May 31, 2021	October 12, 2021
8	BattleKnight	2021	4.927	Active		Game, NFT	February 5, 2022	November 30, 2022
9	Fanadise	2021	4.92	Pre-sale		NFT, marketing, staking, BSC	May 12, 2021	June 30, 2021
10	Recast1 Token	2021	4.91	Active		Trade, Stable Coin, Proof of Transfer and Stake	June 15, 2021	December 5, 2021

Full ICO Rating

Submit ICO

ICO Reviews - Page 12

ICO Rating – Top Ongoing ICOs 2024

Be the first to receive Cryptocurrency Price Predictions and Forecasts daily

Company