13 May 2019
Starting up a company is easy, bringing it into the big time is another thing entirely. Doing that requires a lot of money and traditionally startups have looked to venture capital to finance their early prototypes. Venture capital funds help promising startups succeed by investing a significant portion of the money and the best have contacts in industries that are applicable to the startup in question.
Bitcoin brought about a decentralized currency revolution, but one thing that came about because of this decentralization was the ability for anyone, anywhere to get involved in projects and startups. This lead to the development of a game-changer in raising capital for crypto-based startups – the ICO. First tried in 2013, it gained steam in 2017 when there was a blockchain and ICO frenzy. Everyone wanted in on the action and it lasted until the middle of the following year.
The most obvious difference is that VC funding is given in exchange for equity in the company, whereas a token offering does not give any right to equity in the company. While VC funding has long been used as a gold standard for wise investments, it is still a large risk being undertaken by a single fund which is why equity is needed for Venture Capital. That gives the fund a say in how the business is run and it shares directly in the profits of the business should it succeed.
There has always been a slight divide between venture capitalists and startup owners, and the relationship is rarely as cordial as many would believe. The pressures of adding another partner that has given a large amount of money to your idea are substantial and many founders are not able to do deal with the pressure and simply lose interest in their creation.
That is why what made ICOs so appealing. They were able to directly involve the community in financing projects that they were passionate about while also managing to raise funds for the startup. It created an ecosystem prior to a token being officially launched. Though this relationship between users and companies has been harmed by the number of scam ICOs that have been launched, it is still a unique and clever way to get the best community involvement.
The other difference is one of experience. VC firms will typically have an army of lawyers and economists that a startup can draw from, as well as having a beeline to the best talent through their talent acquisition program. They can put the right people in the right positions (usually the business side, leaving the tech to the people who are most passionate about it) and in that way ensure that the business grows. The business grows and their investment grows and they are able to mitigate the risk of a bad venture.
ICOs do not have this type of experience to draw upon, nor do they have experts in fields not related directly to the technology they are producing. However, what ICOs do have is community power. They are able to leverage the best and brightest in the community and incentivize them with the growth in value of a token that was bought.
The primary buyers of tokens are technically minded people and if they are willing to give their time to make the project a success, it can have a profound impact on the startup and the ecosystem as a whole. However, one weakness of this is that the business side of things is not as well represented and many teams have lopsided management (too many technical people, too few business people).
However, that can be rectified with proper planning.
|#||Crypto||Prediction||Accuracy||CVIX||Price||24h||7d||Market Cap||Volume 24h|
|1||BTC||Bitcoin predictions||82.4%||35||$43 287.80||2.05%||-8.49%||$814 966 927 933||$32 680 812 854|
|2||ETH||Ethereum predictions||72.8%||49||$3 010.99||3.55%||-9.89%||$354 338 554 947||$21 802 081 769|
|3||ADA||Cardano predictions||60%||80||$2.27||-3.89%||-2.90%||$72 613 126 112||$5 577 581 472|
|4||USDT||Tether predictions||94%||1||$1.000700||-0.08%||-0.03%||$68 590 944 713||$79 368 686 289|
|5||BNB||Binance Coin predictions||66.8%||69||$346.18||-1.47%||-14.62%||$58 205 321 046||$1 873 086 247|
|6||XRP||XRP predictions||70.4%||52||$0.947086||0.59%||-10.97%||$44 245 636 148||$3 503 428 805|
|7||SOL||Solana predictions||66.8%||72||$137.06||-1.92%||-13.76%||$40 744 147 032||$2 455 458 712|
|8||USDC||USD Coin predictions||95.2%||1||$1.000483||-0.05%||-0.03%||$31 006 963 781||$3 830 168 851|
|9||DOT||Polkadot predictions||67.6%||69||$29.44||-3.25%||-12.15%||$29 070 856 010||$2 592 379 334|
|10||DOGE||Dogecoin predictions||64%||77||$0.205929||-0.86%||-12.64%||$27 068 780 737||$1 515 174 486|
|11||AVAX||Avalanche predictions||56.8%||87||$68.09||-3.41%||-4.08%||$14 998 710 235||$1 234 318 562|
|12||LUNA||Terra predictions||68.4%||59||$36.34||-4.22%||4.95%||$14 536 281 852||$1 625 437 616|
|13||UNI||UniSwap predictions||64.8%||74||$23.42||20.32%||-1.22%||$14 325 624 849||$1 167 934 535|
|14||BUSD||Binance USD predictions||92.4%||1||$1.000303||-0.07%||-0.05%||$13 693 477 670||$5 597 328 153|
|15||LINK||Chainlink predictions||67.6%||70||$25.06||10.18%||-9.97%||$11 403 176 618||$2 018 605 273|
Get cryptocurrency price predictions, forecasts with analysis and news right to your inbox.
© 2015-2021 Crypto-Rating.com
The usage of this website constitutes acceptance of the following legal information. Any contracts of financial instruments offered to conclude bear high risks and may result in the full loss of the deposited funds. Prior to making transactions one should get acquainted with the risks to which they relate. All the information featured on the website, including information about the cryptocurrencies and bitcoin is intended solely for informational purposes, is not a means of advertising them, and doesn't imply direct instructions for investing. Crypto Rating shall not be liable for any loss, including unlimited loss of funds, which may arise directly or indirectly from the usage of this information. The editorial staff of the website does not bear any responsibility whatsoever for the content of the comments or reviews made by the site users about cryptocurrencies. The entire responsibility for the contents rests with the authors. Reprint of the materials is available only with the permission of the editorial staff.