Estonia's Toughened Crypto Regulation Causes Uproar

May 22, 2019

It appears that the time when many blockchain projects pinned high hopes on Estonia as a new crypto haven are over. Once being considered as one of the few forward-thinking countries in Europe, the government of which kept an open mind with regard to blockchain startups and their initiatives, Estonia seems to have abandoned this course.

Eesti Consulting raises the alarm


A case in point is an indignant report released by Eesti Consulting OU, a consulting company that provides assistance in acquiring cryptocurrency license and legal entity formation for both domestic and foreign startups.

The report claims that the emerging blockchain projects, which display interest in registering in that particular jurisdiction, are now facing an unprecedented bureaucratic resistance due to the recent toughening of regulation concerning the issuance of cryptocurrency (virtual currency activities) licenses.

Eesti complains that the introduced measures are only several steps short of being draconian, and that they had already crippled the image of Estonia that makes effort to become a highly competitive European economy through the creation of an appealing digital business environment for foreign investors, for instance, initiating the e-Residency program.

The reasons for regulatory toughenings


The controversial amendments to the cryptocurrency regulations were introduced on March 3, after the Estonian government passed the bill on virtual currency activity licenses and virtual currency wallet services. The purpose of this bill was to bring the country’s legislation in conformity with the Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive adopted by the member states of the European Union.

The official explanation had it that such stiffening of regulation was required to mitigate the risks of occurrences of money laundering and other financial wrongdoings associated with this area of digital entrepreneurship. 

Martin Helme, the Minister of Finance of Estonia, praised this legislative initiative, claiming that the country had drawn the necessary conclusions from the similar challenges in the banking sector and intend not to repeat the mistake with cryptocurrencies.

What it means for crypto projects


Under this bill, the Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit is obliged to conduct a thorough background check of all domestic and foreign legal entities that apply for the corresponding license. Moreover, the crypto companies that obtained this permit even before the bill came into force would also have to comply with its requirements and provide additional information to the law enforcement agencies until December 31, and fulfill other statutory requirements. Failure to do so may result in the revocation of a license by the state financial market regulator.    

The new regulations also stipulated that the processing period for all new applications to be extended from 30 to 90 days. The state fee for the license issuance was increased almost tenfold, from 345 euro to 3330 euro per permit. To add salt to the injury, the bill demands all crypto companies be either incorporated in Estonia or operate as a branch office of a foreign entity. Such an enterprise must also have a registered office, as well as the board of directors, operating on the territory of the country.

Eesti Consulting OU insists that a lot of promising blockchain startups have already abandoned the idea of applying for a license in Estonia, which will certainly have a disastrous impact on that sector of the economy.

Author: Alex Paulson for Crypto-Rating.com
Cryptocurrency: Bitcoin

The U.S. SEC and SimplyVital Health Settle
The U.S. SEC and SimplyVital Health Settle

The US SEC continues to chase after suspicious ICOs, this time filing an Administrative Proceeding in regards to the ICO held by a project called SimplyVital health...

Fake ICO Reviews Losing Value
Fake ICO Reviews Losing Value

Faking ICO reviews was an easy way to make quite a bit of money for those who knew how to do it properly. The concept itself is easy enough - startups would go to supposedly impartial...

Kik vs. SEC
Kik vs. SEC

It is widely known that the US SEC does not have a great opinion about cryptocurrencies. In fact, it believes that most of them are securities, and as such - unlawful, since they do not follow security regulations. This has been a cause...

Fraudulent ICOs Are Still Around
Fraudulent ICOs Are Still Around

After the ICO trend boomed back in 2017, it quickly started seeing its fair share of problems. Not only were there all kinds of projects emerging everywhere in the world - many of them weak...


Venezuela: Bitcoin Trading at All-Time High
Venezuela: Bitcoin Trading at All-Time High

When times get extremely tough, Bitcoin may come to the rescue. Proven by the people of Venezuela, a long-suffering country which is about to immerse...

Major Filipino Bank Launches Own Cryptocurrency
Major Filipino Bank Launches Own Cryptocurrency

The Union Bank of the Philippines, also referred to as UnionBank, the seventh-largest financial institution of this archipelagic country...

Crypto Projects Are Getting Rid of Their ICO-Gained ETH Coins
Crypto Projects Are Getting Rid of Their ICO-Gained ETH Coins

According to a recent analysis, it seems that ICO projects that accepted ETH coins during their token sales are slowly but surely emptying their wallets...

BAT tipping comes to Twitter
BAT tipping comes to Twitter

Basic Attention Token (BAT) has seen a lot of popularity in the last two years. The token is known for having one of the fastest ICOs in history before Binance Launchpad came...