VVilly
September 13, 2019
The way I see it, the business model employed by Beyond Seen Screen is flawed at its core. No one is going to pay for services that have long become customary to the social television space. Besides, they want users to pay for using the second screen, not the advertisers, which is utterly ridiculous. We have enough "free ads" popping up all over the place. Besides, the competition in this niche would be unbearably tough for Beyond Seen Screen. I would say with a 70% probability that this project won't succeed.
Shaun
August 7, 2019
Using a second screen is for the purposes described by Beyond Seen Screen is a straight road to failure, as proven by the likes of Viggle Beamly, Zeebox, Mobovivo, and many other projects. All of them tried to implement this idea into practice but to no avail. What makes people at Beyond Seen Screen think that they will succeed where many others stumbled? Arrogance or ignorance, perhaps. Besides, using the second screen doesn't require blockchain at all.
Paul
July 29, 2019
Unfortunately, this type of projects tend to come and go in large numbers, and the fact that the ICO was announced over a year ago, and it still wasn't held does not seem great. Still, there is still time, and it is possible that the team is simply taking its time, trying to perfect every aspect of the project instead of rushing an ICO half-prepared.
Andrew
July 29, 2019
There are other issues, such as the fact that most viewers are unlikely to pay for the service as mentioned in the white paper, and it might be more sensible for advertizers to pay users to engage, and not the other way around.
Alex
July 29, 2019
The project has been announced quite a while ago, more than one year back. While it is interesting, it is by no means unique, and it has a lot of competition, which is why it will have to stand out in some way.
* Crypto Rating accepts no liability for content of the Beyond Seen Screen reviews made by the site users. The entire responsibility for the contents rests with the authors.
ICO Rating – Top Ongoing ICOs 2024
| # | ICO | Founded | Rate | Status | KYC | Category | Start | End | ||
| 1 |  |
CNX Network | 2022 | 4.943 | Active | IoT | July 1, 2022 | December 31, 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |  |
Wrapped Minima | 2018 | 4.941 | Active | Blockchain Infrastructure | February 14, 2023 | February 28, 2023 | ||
| 3 |  |
EMCODEX | 2021 | 4.94 | Pre-sale | Commodities, Synthetic Assets | May 18, 2021 | September 30, 2021 | ||
| 4 |  |
LetStudy | 2020 | 4.935 | Upcoming | Education | August 1, 2021 | August 1, 2022 | ||
| 5 |  |
FUNA | 2022 | 4.931 | Active | AI | June 15, 2022 | August 31, 2022 | ||
| 6 |  |
My Lotto Coin | 2020 | 4.93 | Pre-sale | Gaming, Lottery | April 1, 2021 | June 30, 2021 | ||
| 7 |  |
Blockster (BXR) | 2021 | 4.93 | Upcoming | Media | May 31, 2021 | October 12, 2021 | ||
| 8 |  |
BattleKnight | 2021 | 4.927 | Active | Game, NFT | February 5, 2022 | November 30, 2022 | ||
| 9 |  |
Fanadise | 2021 | 4.92 | Pre-sale | NFT, marketing, staking, BSC | May 12, 2021 | June 30, 2021 | ||
| 10 |  |
Recast1 Token | 2021 | 4.91 | Active | Trade, Stable Coin, Proof of Transfer and Stake | June 15, 2021 | December 5, 2021 |
