It is well known that trading in the financial markets is one of the most dynamic and effective ways to make a profit, even in the absence of significant initial capital. That is why it is very popular all over the world. However, it is also well known that this activity is fraught with great risks, and can lead to a complete loss of funds. To trade successfully, a trader must have a good understanding of how the market functions, what the current market situation is and what can happen in the future. Two main types of analysis are traditionally used for these purposes: technical and fundamental.
Technical analysis can be divided into graphical and computer (or indicator) ones. The first one is levels, channels, trends, various patterns. The second is indicators, the readings of which are usually calculated by a computer. They intersect in many cases, since a huge number of indicators have been created on the basis of many graphical tools in recent years. In addition, there are, for example, Elliot waves and Japanese candlesticks, which are also related to technical analysis.
The name of this method speaks for itself, as it is based on the study of price charts. Graphical analysis includes the study of price levels and trends, as well as the identification of various patterns and formations on charts, and other visual analysis tools. In addition, Graphical analysis may include the use of various indicators such as moving averages (MAs) to help traders determine future price directions.
One of the main advantages of graphical analysis is its visualization. It can help identify various trends in the market that may not be obvious when using other methods of analysis. It would seem that charts on a computer or smartphone screen can be easily understood even by novice traders. However, it is not that simple. To use this type of analysis effectively, traders must have a sufficient level of knowledge and experience to understand how to correctly interpret charts and make appropriate decisions. And this may require time and effort to learn and acquire practical skills.
Computer (or indicator) analysis is based on the study of not only price charts, but also trading volumes. The basic assumption is that historical quotes and volumes can be used to predict future prices and trends. Various indicators are used for this, such as moving averages (MA), MACD, RSI, stochastic oscillator, Bollinger Bands and many others, helping the trader to determine the moments of entry and exit from positions.
One of the advantages of technical analysis is that it is based on data that is readily available, including in the MetaTrader-4 (MT4) trading terminal, and can be processed very quickly. Several dozens of most popular indicators are already built into this terminal. In addition, many thousands of other indicators have been developed for MT4. Some of them can be purchased, and some can be downloaded for free.
Such indicators are used to develop strategies and are used both in manual and automated trading using expert advisors. They can be effective not only for long- and medium-term trading, but also, for example, for pipsing and scalping. However, before using it in real trading, we strongly advise you to test each of them on the strategy tester that is available in the MT4 terminal, as well as evaluate its effectiveness on a demo account, which is available for NordFX clients.
Despite all its advantages, technical analysis (both graphical and indicator) is not void serious drawbacks. One of them is that it can react to false signals, especially in volatile market conditions. In addition, the indicator readings are based solely on historical quotes and are late. This applies even to the signals of the so-called leading indicators, which can predict the development of events only by looking for similar situations in the past.
Another drawback is that the indicator readings are highly dependent on their settings. With the same settings, the quality of their work can vary greatly both for different trading instruments and for different time frames. In addition, a change in the market situation can also lead to a failure in their work.
And finally, the most important, in our opinion, drawback is that technical analysis is not able to take into account fundamental factors that can affect market prices in the most unexpected way. That is why a trader can achieve maximum efficiency in their work by combining it with fundamental analysis, as well as other approaches, including risk management, portfolio diversification, etc.
Fundamental analysis is based on the study of economic, financial, political, and social factors that affect the price of an asset. It can help investors determine when the price of an asset is overvalued or undervalued, try to predict how the price of an asset will change in the future, and decide whether to buy or sell an asset.
Fundamental factors may include:
So, the difference between fundamental analysis and technical analysis is as follows. Technical analysis is based on the study of charts and technical indicators, and uses historical price and volume data to predict future market movements. Fundamental analysis uses a wider set of data. It is based on the study of factors that have not only influenced the price of an asset in the past and in the present but may also affect it in the future.
One of the advantages of fundamental analysis is its ability to predict long-term trends and evaluate the fundamental value of an asset. However, it can be complex and require a lot of time and effort to collect and study all the necessary data. In addition, such analysis may not always take into account short-term market events, such as changes in investor sentiment or unexpected geopolitical events. Based on this, fundamental analysis is often used for long-term investments, while technical analysis is used for short-term transactions.
It is important to understand that each of these methods has its advantages and disadvantages, and the best choice depends on the individual needs, strategy, degree of risk and goals of each trader. At the same time, traders often use a combination of both types of analysis. This helps to reduce risks and increase the likelihood of successful trading.
In addition, the study of a large amount of historical data and the use of statistical methods, such as regression analysis, allows you to build mathematical models to identify trends and predict future price directions, as well as to determine the optimal entry and exit points for positions. One of the advantages of such statistical models is their ability to process large amounts of data and reveal hidden trends and dependencies in the market.
However, such statistical modeling, of course, has disadvantages as well and cannot guarantee success. First, it requires significant knowledge in statistics, mathematics, and coding. Secondly, the statistical model can be subject to errors and inaccuracies, especially in complex and atypical market conditions.
If you delve into the biographies of the legendary traders, it becomes clear that they used different types of analysis, although each of them had their own preferences.
# | Crypto | Prediction | Accuracy | CVIX | Price | 24h | 7d | Market Cap | 7d price change | |
1 | BTC | Bitcoin predictions | 63.6% | 72 | $94 946.35 | -1.99% | -3.49% | $1 879 016 687 741 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | ETH | Ethereum predictions | 72% | 59 | $3 575.36 | -2.95% | 2.11% | $430 624 929 405 | ||
3 | USDT | Tether predictions | 92% | 1 | $1.000262 | -0.03% | -0.05% | $134 157 311 196 | ||
4 | XRP | XRP predictions | 57.2% | 88 | $2.25 | 16.57% | 50.45% | $128 289 215 796 | ||
5 | SOL | Solana predictions | 66.4% | 74 | $223.27 | -5.51% | -12.09% | $106 085 511 812 | ||
6 | BNB | Binance Coin predictions | 80% | 32 | $631.81 | -3.91% | -5.46% | $90 986 391 967 | ||
7 | DOGE | Dogecoin predictions | 54.8% | 93 | $0.405291 | -4.20% | -5.89% | $59 590 838 072 | ||
8 | USDC | USD Coin predictions | 91.2% | 1 | $1.000189 | 0.02% | 0.03% | $39 974 395 797 | ||
9 | ADA | Cardano predictions | 59.2% | 84 | $1.064892 | -0.46% | 0.23% | $37 362 685 623 | ||
10 | AVAX | Avalanche predictions | 66.4% | 69 | $45.61 | 3.47% | -0.72% | $18 667 651 203 | ||
11 | TRX | TRON predictions | 60.4% | 80 | $0.204134 | -2.14% | -3.32% | $17 617 491 272 | ||
12 | SHIB | SHIBA INU predictions | 58.4% | 94 | $0.000028 | -5.47% | 7.80% | $16 741 735 529 | ||
13 | TON | Toncoin predictions | 70.4% | 62 | $6.38 | -5.38% | 1.76% | $16 248 957 424 | ||
14 | XLM | Stellar predictions | 57.6% | 89 | $0.504331 | -0.88% | -4.26% | $15 167 763 632 | ||
15 | DOT | Polkadot predictions | 59.2% | 84 | $8.50 | -6.02% | -5.92% | $12 953 160 129 |
Get cryptocurrency price predictions, forecasts with analysis and news right to your inbox.
© 2015-2024 Crypto-Rating.com
The usage of this website constitutes acceptance of the following legal information. Any contracts of financial instruments offered to conclude bear high risks and may result in the full loss of the deposited funds. Prior to making transactions one should get acquainted with the risks to which they relate. All the information featured on the website, including information about the cryptocurrencies and bitcoin is intended solely for informational purposes, is not a means of advertising them, and doesn't imply direct instructions for investing. Crypto Rating shall not be liable for any loss, including unlimited loss of funds, which may arise directly or indirectly from the usage of this information. The editorial staff of the website does not bear any responsibility whatsoever for the content of the comments or reviews made by the site users about cryptocurrencies. The entire responsibility for the contents rests with the authors. Reprint of the materials is available only with the permission of the editorial staff.